I’ve learned that I make my own bed.
Both figuratively and literally.
Figuratively: It is MY fault that I have taken another graduate course in conjunction with writing my thesis. So, I am extra, extra busy (and stressed, but only on days that end in “y”) this semester. But I made my bed…
Remember what I said about awareness? Well, here goes: I DID THIS TO MYSELF. All better.
Literally: Now, regardless of whatever time issues I may have created for myself in the morning (I’m usually racing the clock), I must make my own bed just in case some prospective buyers come through the house. So, right before I fly out of the house, I kick my dogs off the bed and I make my own bed. UGH. For some people, the bed making thing is a real issue–especially for my parents’ generation. But really, unless you’re coming in to buy my house, who really gives a flying comforter whether or not I’ve made my bed.
Besides, even potential buyers did see my bed unmade, should that really make a difference? They’re not biddin g on my homemaker prowess!
I’ve learned that I’m not the only one who takes pleasure reading seriously!
Okay, admittedly I have been reading a whole lot for graduate school lately…not much time for pleaseure reading. BUT, I am licking my chops thinking about the next book that I will read. Will it be The Historian? Will it be Gods Behaving Badly? Will it be The Eyre Affair? (Right. That’s cheating because it’s a book that I plan to teach.) Okay, so what will it be, then? Dog Years? Or maybe something by Walter Mosely….The thing is that I miss reading for pleasure. If you, too, are having difficulty making time to read, check out the following list that I found on Ezine Articles. The title of the article is “Finding Time to Read” (by Barbara Winter) and I think the list is priceless. How many of these things do you do to provide for quality reading time?
Per Barbara Winter, “1. Carry a book with you at all times.”
My comment: I do this! In fact, I drove the ladies in Nortstrom crazy when my husband and I were shopping for my birthday present! We invested (I’m afraid to say) in a purse that is just perfect for my obsession with books!
Winter “2. Eliminate something else that takes your time.”
Me: I rarely watch television anymore. Plus, I avoid laundry and other chores whenever I can:)
Winter “3. Listen to audiobooks.”
Me: Sorry folks. No can do. My minds wanders. I need the ACT of reading to keep me focused.
Winter “4. Travel by public transportation. “
Me: Don’t really have that option, but I read when my husband’s at the wheel!
Winter “5. Wear your iPod. “
Me: My IPod hurts my ears. Not an issue, anyway, since I can’t listen to books.
Winter, “6. Don’t finish books that you don’t enjoy. “
Me: Not sure about this. It feels like abandonment to me. Although…I did recently abandon Eat, Pray, Love. Thought it was a little bit too preachy.
Winter, “7. Learn to skim.”
Me: How else does one read an 800 page book in on sitting?
Winter, “8. Have a regular reading time daily.”
Me: I promise I’ll try, but one would have to have a regular schedule for that, no?
Winter, “9. Make reading a high priority. “
Me: I do. Really. There are few other things I would rather do than sit my butt on the couch and curl up with a good book…or a mediocre book…or even a book for graduate school. Maybe that’s why my chores pile up. Oh, well.
p.s. Sorry about the italics…I just can’t seem to get them to go away. Do I look sophistocated?
I’ve learned that fear is the biggest fear of all…
“So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance.”–FDR
Here’s a link to FDR’s inaugural address. Funny how so man years later, his words ring true to me both personally and as a citizen of the U.S. during what the media calls a recession.
Does anybody else out there think that this so-called recession is a construct of the media? That if we lived out lives (somebody please buy my house so that I can buy another house), the supposed recession will be no more?
Let’s not retreat anymore. Let’s advance!
I’ve learned that one-sided blogging is no fun.
Is anybody out there? Am I really going to continue to talk to myself but to sound like I’m talking to others? Who are the others? (I know, sounds like a bad episode of Lost.) Bet if I tagged “Lost” I would get a few hits. But I’m not going to do that because that would be a sick joke to all of those Lost junkies out there. I’ve all but given up the show, mostly for lack of time. Can anybody say “Thursday night class?” I know, I DVR (see how technical I can be?) Lost every week, but I have yet to watch an episode this season. Turns out that I don’t have so much as a spare hour to dedicate to the show. Whatever.
Anyway, I’m even beginning to bore myself. Blah. Blah. Blah. I am afraid to say too much for fear that I’ll somehow put my professional reputation in jeopardy. Like I said, boring.
I don’t want to tag too much and/or to reveal too much about myself (No “lonelybrink15″ here)for fear that some cyber-freak will prey on me. Is that bad? No? Just boring, right?
Boring, like I said, but not boring enough for me to put myself out there to solicit responses. I think I would be better at hitting other people’s blogs and telling people off. (Many popular blogs just seem to piss me off.)
That’s all; I’m done being boring and writing in isolation for now. (Actually, I think I might have one more post in me tonight.)
I’ve learned how to program my cable box.
Okay, so the other night, I was watching TV when I realized that I had absolutely NO idea what time it was. I rely on the cable box display for the time when I’m in my living room, but all it told me was what channel I was watching. Who even cares what channel is on?????????????? At any rate, I knew that something was rotten in Techno City, so I decided to explore, what with my regular IT guy (my husband) several states away and of no help at all.
Long story short, I conquered the cable box clock situation with some minor technological out-patient surgery (i.e. some manipulation of menus and settings and such). What? You think I’m nuts. Not all there. Wacky. Goofy. Boring. Stupid? Maybe to you, but to myself I’m a regular living room hero! A technological wizard.
I’ve learned that I’m satisfied with facing, not necessarily conquering, my fears.
I’m afraid of technological exposure, that people will misconstrue, misrepresent, or otherwise misuse my words and pictures. So, what do I do? I blog. Still afraid, yes, but exposing myself electronically one post at a time.
I’m afraid of a car spinning out of control on the drag strip. So, what do I do? I strap on my helmet and race my own truck at Atco Raceway. Deathly afraid to the point of stomach sickness, I faced my fear. But, I have to say that I am still very nervous about losing control. It does not stand to reason that you could spin wheels and take off like a rocket time after time without SOMEBODY losing control. I still fear that the out of control person will be me or the guy racing next to me…or somebody I know…or anybody…I just don’t want anyone to get hurt. Nonetheless, I’ve raced by truck. There.
I’m afraid to take chaperone students anywhere off of school property. So, what do I do? I allow myself to be added to this year’s group of SENIOR FLORIDA TRIP chaperones. All that responsibility!!!!! Yikes, and in this crazy, crazy world. As it turns out, the fear itself was worse than the job. The kids were great…still, there are so many what ifs.
I’m afraid of drowning, of water that is so deep and vast that it literally swallows me up, never to be seen again. So, what do I do? I go deep sea fishing in waters as deep as several hundred feet. Actually, it was on that trip that my husband said, “It would only take six feet of water for you to drown.” Good point. Now, that’s not to say that I don’t imagine my deep water demise when I’m out on the high seas, but I’m much more at ease having faced my fear.
More fears some other day.
READING QUESTIONS: I’ve learned that reading, more often than not, generates questions without answers.
In the interest of brevity, I’ll say this: Racism as a topic/concern/discussion/problem has been coming up over and over again as of late, in work, at school, in my pleasure reading, in my curriculum, in the hallways and faculty rooms at school, on my blog, and, alas, in my graduate school reading.
This week’s readings included Color Monitors: The Black Face of Technology in America by Martin Kevorkian. Here, Kevorkian details and exemplifies his theory that media and film representations of both black men and technology seem to depict both black men and technology as arefears that are to be contained: Technology by the skills and cyber “slavery” of the black man and the black man by the distraction of the computer monitor and the inner workings of the modern machine.
I am, at once, torn between two DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT reactions:
1. IS HE SERIOUS? ARE FILM MAKERS AND ADVERTISERS SOMEHOW (EITHER CONSCIOUSLY OR SUBCONSCIOUSLY) SENDING THE MESSAGE THAT BLACK MEN NEED TO BE CONTAINED BY THE COMPUTER? IS MASS MEDIA SUGGESTING, SOMEHOW THAT FEARS OF TECHNOLOGY AND BLACK MEN RESULT IN A BLACK COMPUTER WORKFORCE WITH JOBS THAT SERVE AS A METAPHOR FOR SLAVERY? THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2. Or, IS KEVORKIAN’S ASSERTION–that the media is casting black men in specific technological roles– OUTRAGEOUS? AFTER ALL, HE DOES PRESENT A PLETHORA OF EXAMPLES THAT SEEM TO SUPPORT HIS THEORIES. (But, I still can’t shake the feeling that he presents ONLY examples that support his theories and that there are equally as many examples that would weaken Kevorkian’s argument.)
So, for anyone who has read or will venture a read of Kevorkian’s Color Monitors, I have a few questions:
1. Is Kevorkian’s theory of mass media’s tendency towards a depiction of technological and black male containment legitimate or is Kevorkian’s book simply full of instances in which the author reaches and stretches to find seemingly racially motivated film producers, advertisements, companies, etc.?
2. Is the black actor as a technologically adept character an insult OR is it a compliment?
3. Is Color Monitors an entirely different book without its last chapter? Why did Kevorkian include a chapter that seems, in part, to refute a good part of his own assertions? Does the idea of white people being “blackened” by the “drudgery” of technology weaken or strengthen Kevorkian’s theory?
4. After having read all of Kevorkian’s film casting examples (black men as techno-nerds), would you say that racism abounds in Hollywood? In America? Does the book translate into reality?
5. What is wrong with, “…gloss[ing] over the casting decision as a well-intentioned attempt to give a black actor exposure in the most positive and talent-affirming supporting part”? (17) …other than the fact that Kevorkian wouldn’t have a book if he did that.
6. Kevorkian writes, “When people hear ‘digital divide,’ they tend to think in terms of black and white” (39), at which time he also mentions that people are stuck on this perception of the digital divide, despite the fact that “…the degree of technological access does correlate to a range of categories, including geography, income, and ethnicity.” To what do you attibute the digital divide? What other groups are separated by the “digital divide”? I most associate a difference in age with the digital divide–a division between the old and young. What about… Rich and poor? Educated and uneducated? Fearful and fearless? Curious and indifferent? Male and female?
7. The last chapter includes an extensive discussion about technology and creativity, specifically that some see technology as a threat to individual creativity (151). Is technology a threat to individual creativity?
8. As I mentioned at the beginning of this post, racism as a topic and a concern has come to the forefront in so many aspects of my life as of late. I am searching my mind for a solution here, and the best that I can come up with is the idea of everybody treating people like people…the whole John Donne’s “No man is an island” thing…”therefore as not for whom the bells tolls, it tolls for thee” and all that jazz. Human beings are human beings and there it is. We are all alike in more ways than we are different. I am not suggesting permanently ignoring that which makes us different, but I think that if we are going to get to that point ever (the point at which we recognize, accept and celebrate differences), we need to start somewhere. It seems to me that to start with recognizing differences is a bit ass backwards. Maybe we should start by celebrating ourselves as a human race…by treating each other like brothers and sisters…all of us…
I don’t know. That ’s just one of my ideas to help combat racism. My idea is touched upon in the late pages of chapter 5 with the discussion of Ellison’s novel Invisible Man. Kevorkian writes, “In Invisible Man, when the narrator-protagonist makes his first social appearance at a meeting of the progressively minded Brotherhood, one of the white members commits the faux pas of asking him to sing. The politically correct leader of the party becomes furious, proscribing the invitation to the black man as an out-of-bounds stereotype: ‘The brother does not sing!’ But reflecting upon this exchange, the narrator finds that ’something disturbed me: Shouldn’t there be some way for us to be asked to sing?’” (150). And then, on page 151, “The Time of Our Singing offers at least two answers: (1) if he has chosen to pursue that skill; (2) what black man?” THIS IS NOT SO MUCH A QUESTION AS A SOLICITATION FOR COMMENTS/DISCUSSION.